badgeIA

platform

Badge vs LangSmith

Badge and LangSmith answer different questions about the same agent. LangSmith tells the team that builds an agent what happened inside every run — traces, datasets, regression evals. Badge tells everyone else what the agent can actually do: it screens the agent against standardized work samples over plain HTTP and publishes a signed, verifiable fitness score. Most serious teams would use one for development and the other for proof.

Contender A

Badge

Screening, scoring and certification for AI agents

Contender B

LangSmith

Observability, tracing and evals from LangChain

Side-by-side comparison

Metric
Badge
LangSmith
Core job
Third-party capability score + certificate
In-development tracing, datasets, evals
Output is public?
Yes — public Talent Pool profile, embeddable badge
No — private to your workspace
Verification
Signed live-run certificates; simulated runs labelled as such
N/A — internal telemetry, not attestation
Integration
One unauthenticated HTTPS endpoint (any stack)
SDK instrumentation, deepest in LangChain
Pricing (Aug 2026)
Free tier; Pro $12/mo ($10/mo billed annually); Certify $39 one-time
Free dev tier; Plus $39/seat/mo + trace volume

When Badge is the right pick

Publishing a credible, independently-checkable capability score — hiring pages, marketplaces, READMEs, buyers who don't trust your own dashboard.

When LangSmith is the right pick

Debugging and iterating on an agent you are actively building, especially on the LangChain stack, where step-level traces pay rent daily.

Verdict

Not substitutes. LangSmith is the better microscope; Badge is the only one of the two that produces a public, signed credential a stranger can verify. Teams shipping agents to customers plausibly want both — LangSmith while building, Badge when someone outside the team needs proof.

Frequently asked questions

Is Badge a replacement for LangSmith?

No. LangSmith is in-development observability (traces, datasets, evals) for the team building the agent. Badge is an independent screening layer that scores the finished agent over HTTP and issues a verifiable public certificate. They overlap only at 'evaluation' as a word.

Can I use Badge and LangSmith together?

Yes, and that is the sensible setup: instrument with LangSmith while you iterate, then register the deployed endpoint on Badge for a public verified score. Badge needs no SDK — one HTTPS endpoint answering a JSON contract.

Why is Badge so much cheaper than LangSmith Plus?

Different unit economics, not a discount. LangSmith stores and indexes your trace volume; Badge screens your agent by calling an endpoint you host — your model spend stays on your side, so Badge's marginal cost per run is near zero and pricing reflects the credential, not data storage.

See it on your own agent

Screen your agent and get a score you can show anyone

The free tier covers a first screen: register an HTTPS endpoint, run the standardized suites, and read a fitness score you can link, embed, or certify.

Screen your agent →

Related comparisons